This is a TRAVESTY

[GHafez7]

Proposition 83, "Jessica's Law" was passed by the voters of California. And now a rouge judge, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, has decided that she cares more about the feelings of a sex offender than the feelings of safety of parents and children. This judge is most likely a democrat, the overwhelming opposition to Jessica's law comes from that side of the political spectrum. Now before you libbies go crazy on me...many, if not the majority of democratic voters also voted for this law to take effect. I am just merely pointing out that the major opposition to this law came from that other party. This is a travesty, the will of the people is being usurped by a judge and for what reason? So as not to offend a sex-offender? Am I the only one that sees the ridiculousness of this?! Hopefully Bill O'Reily will take this cause up as he did the judge in Vermont.

[Diamond Dog]

I think Bill O'Reilly is too busy making sexually harassing phone calls to help out your cause.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

Sure the libbies are stupid, but what's up with you fascist right wingers and your sex scandals?



Proposition 83, "Jessica's Law" was passed by the voters of California. And now a rouge judge, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, has decided that she cares more about the feelings of a sex offender than the feelings of safety of parents and children. This judge is most likely a democrat, the overwhelming opposition to Jessica's law comes from that side of the political spectrum. Now before you libbies go crazy on me...many, if not the majority of democratic voters also voted for this law to take effect. I am just merely pointing out that the major opposition to this law came from that other party. This is a travesty, the will of the people is being usurped by a judge and for what reason? So as not to offend a sex-offender? Am I the only one that sees the ridiculousness of this?! Hopefully Bill O'Reily will take this cause up as he did the judge in Vermont.

[GHafez7]

I think Bill O'Reilly is too busy making sexually harassing phone calls to help out your cause.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

Sure the libbies are stupid, but what's up with you fascist right wingers and your sex scandals?

The dums...I mean dems..aren't immune from sex scandals either. Remember your revered Bill Clinton? What about Gary Conditt? Gerry Studds? Do I need to continue? The difference is that the Republicans have the class to resing...the dums...damn there i go again...sorry...the dems always try to manage their way out of it. Shows you what low class the democratic political leaders are.

[Diamond Dog]

Sure, the dumbs get caught up in sex scandals too. They can't keep their pants on! ! !

However, you retards, I mean republicans, seem to hold up the banner of righteousness all the time. The GOP and right wing and bible thumpers are so holier than thou. At least the dumbs don't run for office on that fictitious "family values" crap.


The dums...I mean dems..aren't immune from sex scandals either. Remember your revered Bill Clinton? What about Gary Conditt? Gerry Studds? Do I need to continue? The difference is that the Republicans have the class to resing...the dums...damn there i go again...sorry...the dems always try to manage their way out of it. Shows you what low class the democratic political leaders are.

[GHafez7]

Sure, the dumbs get caught up in sex scandals too. They can't keep their pants on! ! !

However, you retards, I mean republicans, seem to hold up the banner of righteousness all the time. The GOP and right wing and bible thumpers are so holier than thou. At least the dumbs don't run for office on that fictitious "family values" crap.


Awww...come on now...you can admit that the republicans have a little more class then the dums...I mean dems (by the way...thanks for copying my joke...they say that imitation is the highest form of flattery...I greatly appreciate it). Point out one dum...err...dem who has resigned when a scandal hit him...can't? Didn't think so.

[2smart4u]

the republicans have a little more class then the dums...I mean dems .

LMAO!!! You CAN'T be serious!

[GHafez7]

LMAO!!! You CAN'T be serious!

All you have are childish little arguments that have yet to be backed up by any facts. You couldn't deny my arguments about gay "marriage" so you called me a bigot, and your maturity level has spiraled downward ever since. Its been fun STOOPING DOWN to your level, but any posts you direct at me from now on will be ignored.

[2smart4u]

All you have are childish little arguments that have yet to be backed up by any facts. You couldn't deny my arguments about gay "marriage" so you called me a bigot, and your maturity level has spiraled downward ever since. Its been fun STOOPING DOWN to your level, but any posts you direct at me from now on will be ignored.

Um, looked in a mirror lately? All YOU have is childish arguments and zero facts. You are a bigot, and your maturity level has remained extremely low all along. You will NEVER be able to rise to my level, so you have obviously stopped even trying. And talk about childish! You can't back up your arguments, so you resort to the old, "I'm going to ignore you" cop-out. That means one thing: You are defeated.

[Nicola]

Um, looked in a mirror lately? All YOU have is childish arguments and zeero facts. You are a bigot, and your maturity level has remined extremely low all along. You will NEVER be able to rise to my level, so you have obviously stopped even trying. And talk about childish! You can't back up your arguments, so you resort to the old, "I'm going to ignore you" cop-out. That means one thing: You are defeated.

Imagine you two trying to solve some of these difficult problems facing the world. We are all depending on you guys to come to some sort of agreement that would be fair for all of us. Would we be well served by seriously listening to your points of view?

[2smart4u]

Imagine you two trying to solve some of these difficult problems facing the world. We are all depending on you guys to come to some sort of agreement that would be fair for all of us. Would we be well served by seriously listening to your points of view?

Only mine.

[Nicola]

Only mine.

Your having fun. That's ok. I try to expand my thinking by being receptive to new ideas.

[2smart4u]

I am only receptive to intelligent new ideas.

[2smart4u]

Proposition 83, "Jessica's Law" was passed by the voters of California. And now a rouge judge, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, has decided that she cares more about the feelings of a sex offender than the feelings of safety of parents and children. This judge is most likely a democrat, the overwhelming opposition to Jessica's law comes from that side of the political spectrum. Now before you libbies go crazy on me...many, if not the majority of democratic voters also voted for this law to take effect. I am just merely pointing out that the major opposition to this law came from that other party. This is a travesty, the will of the people is being usurped by a judge and for what reason? So as not to offend a sex-offender? Am I the only one that sees the ridiculousness of this?! Hopefully Bill O'Reily will take this cause up as he did the judge in Vermont.

So is a rouge judge better than, say, a lipstick judge?
Why did you fail to provide a link to whatever it is your talking about?
Why is it you think you can tell the political leaning of a judge from one decision?
Doesn't sound like your hero, Bill, will be pushing for this proposition to pass.