Wednesday
August
20
2014
3:24 pm
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

Judge ousts defendant twice from Guantanamo court
December 18, 2013, 05:00 AM The Associated Press

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The military judge presiding over the Sept. 11 war crimes tribunal at Guantanamo ejected one defendant from the courtroom twice Tuesday for speaking out of turn, adding a bit of drama to an otherwise dry pretrial motions hearing at the U.S. naval base in Cuba.

Ramzi Binalshibh, one of five Guantanamo prisoners charged with orchestrating the Sept. 11 terrorist attack, refused repeated warnings to stop trying to address the judge about what he claims are efforts by guards to keep him awake at night with banging sounds inside his cell.

But the judge, whose courtroom was repeatedly disrupted when the defendants were arraigned in May 2012, was having none of it. Army Col. James Pohl ordered troops to remove Binalshibh and place him in a holding cell.

Then the same scene repeated itself in the afternoon session, and the judge warned it would happen again if the defendant tried again on Wednesday. “If he is disruptive he will be escorted from the courtroom,” Pohl told the lawyers for Binalshibh.

He also said he was concerned that the prisoner might shout out classified information, prompting courtroom censors to cut the sound. “I don’t know what he’ll say,” he said.

Both removals occurred as the judge asked Binalshibh if he understood he has the right to be absent from the remainder of the pretrial motions hearing this week. The four other defendants also answered in the affirmative.

Binalshibh used the question as an opportunity to repeat claims that prison authorities use sounds and vibrations to keep him awake at night inside Camp 7, the high-security section of Guantanamo where he and the other defendants in the Sept. 11 case are held. Prosecutors say they have looked into the matter and were assured that no noises are being made.

The prisoner became more agitated as the judge attempted to silence him. Speaking in a mixture of English and Arabic, he referred to the “secret CIA prison,” and said his life was in danger. As he was being led out, he shouted to the judge “You are a war criminal.”

The conditions of confinement are a major issue in the proceedings since Binalshibh and his four co-defendants were held in CIA prisons overseas, and subjected to treatment that their lawyers say amounted to torture, before they were taken to Guantanamo in September 2006.

Pohl suggested to Navy Lt. Cmdr. Kevin Bogucki, a Pentagon-appointed lawyer for Binalshibh, that the prisoner may need a mental evaluation. The lawyer said his client is “not delusional” and the court should order an attempt to document any noise because the lack of sleep is inhibiting the 41-year-old prisoner’s ability to attend court sessions.

“It’s not that he doesn’t want to be present,” Bogucki said. “He wants to be meaningfully present.”

The rest of the day’s session dealt largely with arguments on a defense motion to dismiss the charges based on their claim that the capital charges against the five prisoners were improperly filed. The session, the eighth since their arraignment, is scheduled to run through Friday.

All five prisoners face trial by military commission, a special court for wartime offenses that includes elements of the military and civilian legal systems, on charges that include terrorism, hijacking and nearly 3,000 counts of murder for their alleged roles planning and aiding the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack. Prosecutors have requested a trial in early 2015 but a date has not been set.

 

 

Tags: binalshibh, judge, guantanamo, courtroom, their, defendants,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
Is it fair for the state to fine water wasters when broken and leaky pipes are losing billions of gallons?

Yes. Those are two different problems.
No. The state needs to gets its infrastructure in order first.
Yes but the pipes need fixing, too.
Would you expect anything else from government?

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Bank of America reaches $17B settlement with U.S.
WASHINGTON — Bank of America has reached a record $17 billion settlement to resolve an investigati..
Obama: U.S. won’t stop confronting Islamic State
WASHINGTON — The United States stood firm Wednesday in its fight against Islamic State militants w..
South San Francisco to be fogged for West Nile Thursday night
Mosquitoes infected with West Nile virus have spread to South San Francisco and prompted San Mateo ..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County DBA