Friday
October
24
2014
5:44 pm
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

Editorial: PG&E fine should go to pipeline improvements
September 03, 2014, 05:00 AM Editorial

No amount of money will make up for the loss of life, property and the overall well-being for those affected by the 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion and fire, a $1.4 billion penalty issued Tuesday against Pacific Gas and Electric puts a monetary figure on the loss.

Unfortunately, a significant chunk of that penalty will go directly to the state rather than used for pipeline safety. Of the $1.4 billion, $950 million will go to the state’s coffers.

Last year, staff at the California Public Utilities Commission had recommended a $2.25 billion fine that would come from shareholders and not rate payers. Tuesday’s penalty is in addition to a $635 million penalty the CPUC issued previously. So the utility is on the hook for a significant amount of penalties for the blast that killed eight, injured dozens and destroyed 38 homes.

Having the fine go toward safety measures would make it tax deductible for the utility, so the money going to the state would be a larger hit. However, the fine should not just be punitive, though PG&E even admits it deserves some penalty for the explosion and fire. The cause of the blast was described as a “litany of failures” by the utility, at least according to the National Transportation Safety Board when reviewing the incident. Those failures were essentially a wake-up call for additional safety measures for the miles of gas pipeline in the utility’s service area. While PG&E has made improvements to its gas delivery service, much more could be done and using the entire amount for that goal should be the point of this action.

The ultimate goal is to ensure that a tragedy that took place in San Bruno never happens again. The entire amount of the penalty should go toward pipeline safety and not directly to the state. If that money finds its way into the state’s general fund, rather than specifically earmarked for safety testing and replacing and upgrading gas transmission lines, it is a total waste.

 

 

Tags: safety, penalty, state, utility, pipeline,


Other stories from today:

September song?
Editorial: PG&E fine should go to pipeline improvements
Letter: Small businesses need to stay
 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
What is the most important issue facing the United States right now?

Ebola
Islamic State
Income gap
Russia/Ukraine
Immigration
Health care
The economy

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Iraqi officials say IS militants used chlorine gas
BAGHDAD — Islamic State militants used chlorine gas during fighting with security forces and Shiit..
Ford profit falls in third quarter on truck costs
DEARBORN, Mich. — Ford's new aluminum-sided F-150 will be a lot lighter and more efficient when it..
Federal officials: Dallas nurse free of Ebola
WASHINGTON — The first nurse diagnosed with Ebola after treating an infected man at a Dallas hospi..
After 1st Ebola case in NYC, 3 others quarantined
NEW YORK — Officials tried to tamp down New Yorkers' fears Friday after a doctor was diagnosed wit..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County garage sales