Wednesday
May
27
2015
6:46 pm
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 
Editorial: PG&E fine should go to pipeline improvements
September 03, 2014, 05:00 AM Editorial

No amount of money will make up for the loss of life, property and the overall well-being for those affected by the 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion and fire, a $1.4 billion penalty issued Tuesday against Pacific Gas and Electric puts a monetary figure on the loss.

Unfortunately, a significant chunk of that penalty will go directly to the state rather than used for pipeline safety. Of the $1.4 billion, $950 million will go to the state’s coffers.

Last year, staff at the California Public Utilities Commission had recommended a $2.25 billion fine that would come from shareholders and not rate payers. Tuesday’s penalty is in addition to a $635 million penalty the CPUC issued previously. So the utility is on the hook for a significant amount of penalties for the blast that killed eight, injured dozens and destroyed 38 homes.

Having the fine go toward safety measures would make it tax deductible for the utility, so the money going to the state would be a larger hit. However, the fine should not just be punitive, though PG&E even admits it deserves some penalty for the explosion and fire. The cause of the blast was described as a “litany of failures” by the utility, at least according to the National Transportation Safety Board when reviewing the incident. Those failures were essentially a wake-up call for additional safety measures for the miles of gas pipeline in the utility’s service area. While PG&E has made improvements to its gas delivery service, much more could be done and using the entire amount for that goal should be the point of this action.

The ultimate goal is to ensure that a tragedy that took place in San Bruno never happens again. The entire amount of the penalty should go toward pipeline safety and not directly to the state. If that money finds its way into the state’s general fund, rather than specifically earmarked for safety testing and replacing and upgrading gas transmission lines, it is a total waste.

 

 

Tags: safety, penalty, state, utility, pipeline,


Other stories from today:

Letter: ISIS needs to be taken down
September song?
Editorial: PG&E fine should go to pipeline improvements
 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
What do you think of home solar panels?

I have them, they are great
I have them, not so great
Thinking about getting them
Too expensive for the benefit
Heard they have problems
Don't like them

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Islamic State suicide attacks in Iraq's Anbar kill 17 troops
BAGHDAD — Islamic State extremists unleashed a wave of suicide attacks targeting the Iraqi army in..
Greece says deal with creditors is close; markets rally
ATHENS, Greece — Greece's prime minister said Wednesday that his country is close to reaching a de..
EPA issues final rules protecting drinking water, streams
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration issued new rules Wednesday to protect the nation's drinking ..
Soccer officials arrested in Zurich; World Cup votes probed
ZURICH — Swiss prosecutors opened criminal proceedings into FIFA's awarding of the 2018 and 2022 W..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2015 San Mateo Daily Journal
Millbrae news