3:28 am
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Opinion / Letters
  Arts / Entertainment
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  DJ Designers
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
Guest perspective: Walking away
July 07, 2014, 05:00 AM By Mark Olbert

Last week the San Carlos City Council, on which I serve, opted not to move forward a proposal to swap properties with the San Carlos Elementary School District. The deal, part of which required voter approval, would have reduced school site overcrowding, better balanced rush hour traffic congestion and avoided the loss of already critically-short athletic field space.

Despite majorities of both the council and the school board supporting the plan — for technical reasons moving forward required a four-fifths vote — it died. We stepped up to the line. And walked away.

Like any significant public decision, parts of our community would have benefited from the deal and parts would have been impacted. That’s inevitable in all but the most trivial public actions.

But a critical responsibility for all elected officials is to seek mitigations and compromise, and to challenge interested parties to do the same. That was done on the Transit Village — multiple times! — and in the evolution of the land swap itself. Yet despite repeated calls to do so, that approach was ultimately rejected by the opposition. Instead, neighborhood concerns — many of which were understandably magnified to excess by fear and passion — were used as rationales to keep the community from having its say at the ballot box. That was an abdication of leadership.

Concerns over divisiveness, and the potential for an election to tear San Carlos apart, were also cited as reasons for scuttling the deal. That concern, however well-intentioned, insults the people we represent. San Carlos is a strong community, full of adults who know how to disagree one moment and collaborate the next. Our council meetings on the swap were filled to overflowing with speakers passionately holding beliefs on both sides of the issue. Yet civility and decorum prevailed. Because of the expectations the Council set, and the character of our community.

Elected leaders don’t have to, and shouldn’t, sit idly by when big issues go before voters. They have a role to play beyond supporting or opposing measures. They should set an example through their behavior, challenge misinformation and, when necessary, call for decorum and reasoned debate. Being unwilling to fulfill that civic responsibility is also an abdication of leadership.

At the end of the day, killing the swap did nothing to address the issues it was designed to address. San Carlos is on track to lose a major athletic field, suffer worse traffic and contend with overcrowded school sites. Those problems will now have to be dealt with in more difficult and expensive ways.

Unless, of course, leadership responsibilities get abdicated once again. Let’s hope that doesn’t happen. But walking away from duty can be a difficult habit to break.

Mark Olbert is the mayor of San Carlosand a former member of the school board.



Tags: school, carlos, council, community, leadership, would,

Other stories from today:

Letter: Land swap issue should have won
The war to end all wars
Letter: Black-robed hypocrites

Print this Page Print this Page  | 
<< Back
Return To Archives

Daily Journal Quick Poll
Do you think the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors should increase a proposed $15 million a year in Measure K half-cent sales tax revenue for affordable housing?

No, $15 million a year is enough
No, the money should go to other needs
Yes, it should be $20 million a year
Yes, it should be even higher than $20 million a year
Not sure


©2017 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County courts