Wednesday
August
20
2014
3:26 pm
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

Editorial: Greenberg for Superior Court judge
May 07, 2014, 05:00 AM Editorial

Campaigns for judicial seats in the San Mateo County Superior Court are rare. Typically, judges run unopposed and races only take place if there is a retirement or if the sitting judge is named to a new position. That is the case with Office Four, vacated when Judge Beth Freeman was appointed to the federal bench.

Running for her seat are two people with long histories in this county and in law. Jeffrey Hayden is working hard for this seat on the bench and has many bright ideas on how to improve it. He also has a good mindset for what it takes to be a judge in this county.

However, Susan Greenberg is a more natural fit for this position. With 14 years as a court commissioner under her belt, she knows the position and what it entails. Court commissioners essentially act in the capacity as a judge and are typically assigned to lower level matters. It is that experience from which Greenberg will draw when she takes this new position. Still, there are other positives. While both candidates emphasize the need for efficiency created by an understanding and adherence to the computer age and paperless technology, Greenberg has already put that into practice in our duty as court commissioner.

When it comes to sentencing and a philosophy behind it, both point to the success of alternative sentencing programs such as drug treatment and mental health court but also suggest there needs to be funding for it to work effectively. Both seem open to alternatives to jail such as ankle monitoring but said the sheriff has the ultimate decision. Greenberg seems more steadfast in not considering factors like immigration or the loss of a professional license in sentencing but both said it should be case by case.

Both also seem to have a sensitivity to the people they will serve and acknowledgment of the sometimes strenuous tasks in front of a judge — that decisions matter and can ultimately change lives. Hayden has a more philosophical way of speaking and seems to paint a broader picture when making a point while Greenberg is quick and very matter of fact when making her points. That unhalted and pragmatic approach has likely been refined after 14 years behind the bench as a court commissioner. In this type of race, that straightforward approach and experience is crucial for the position. Greenberg deserves your vote.

 

 

Tags: court, greenberg, position, judge, bench, sentencing,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
Is it fair for the state to fine water wasters when broken and leaky pipes are losing billions of gallons?

Yes. Those are two different problems.
No. The state needs to gets its infrastructure in order first.
Yes but the pipes need fixing, too.
Would you expect anything else from government?

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Bank of America reaches $17B settlement with U.S.
WASHINGTON — Bank of America has reached a record $17 billion settlement to resolve an investigati..
Obama: U.S. won’t stop confronting Islamic State
WASHINGTON — The United States stood firm Wednesday in its fight against Islamic State militants w..
South San Francisco to be fogged for West Nile Thursday night
Mosquitoes infected with West Nile virus have spread to South San Francisco and prompted San Mateo ..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County name change notice