Thursday
September
18
2014
2:46 pm
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

Other voices: A vote against competition
April 14, 2014, 05:00 AM Orange County Register

It is no secret that labor unions have tremendous pull with Democratic politicians in Sacramento, but that love affair went to new heights earlier this month when the Assembly passed a union-backed resolution calling for an end to the common practice of contracting out certain services to private-sector providers.

Assembly Resolution 29, sponsored by Assemblyman Jimmy Gomez, D-Los Angeles, asserts that “the Assembly opposes outsourcing of public services and assets, which harms transparency, accountability, shared prosperity and competition, and supports processes that give public service workers the opportunity to develop their own plan on how to deliver cost-effective, high-quality services.”

In fact, the resolution seeks to eliminate transparency, accountability and competition completely and rely for services instead on government monopolies.

The nonbinding measure also ominously declares that “the Assembly intends to introduce and advocate for responsible outsourcing legislation.”

Competition provides the impetus for providing goods and services at the highest quality and the lowest cost. It is precisely the lack of competition that has led to government inefficiency. How often have we heard public employee unions loudly complain about a contracting proposal, only to find that, when they are forced to compete with the private sector they discover they can do the job for much less. And in the rare case that you get a really bad contractor, you can fire him. Try doing that with a government agency.

To be sure, there are good and bad ways of doing contracting. Governments should use a transparent, competitive bidding process, utilize performance-based contracting — which spells out desired service levels and rewards contractors for exceeding goals and punishes them for poor performance — and maintain strong contract oversight.

Many of the things government does are clearly commercial in nature, and can be found in the Yellow Pages. It would be a grievous mistake to deny the benefits and successes of outsourcing and rely instead on monopolistic bureaucracies whose budgets are determined by political influence, rather than by economic conditions and how well they serve their customers.

 

 

Tags: services, assembly, contracting, competition, government, outsourcing,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
How important is it that your food is organic?

Extremely important
Important
Somewhat important
Not important
In my house, organic; elsewhere, who cares?

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Man arrested in fast-growing California wildfire
CAMINO — A man has been charged with deliberately starting a Northern California wildfire that has..
Senate next after House backs Obama on rebel aid
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's request for congressional backing to train and arm Syrian re..
Australian police: Raids thwarted beheading plot
SYDNEY — Police on Thursday said they thwarted a plot to carry out beheadings in Australia by supp..
Average U.S. 30-year mortgage rate at 4.23 percent
WASHINGTON — Average long-term U.S. mortgage rates surged this week, marking their largest one-wee..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County open houses