Monday
August
03
2015
8:23 pm
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 
OP-ED: Exposing the CIA’s ‘dark side’
April 10, 2014, 05:00 AM Los Angeles Times

More than a year after it approved a report critical of the CIA’s interrogation and detention policies, the Senate Intelligence Committee has voted to make a portion of the document public. It’s now up to President Obama to ensure that the agency doesn’t mount a rear-guard attempt to censor or sanitize the committee’s findings in the name of national security.

Thanks to news reports and a report by the CIA’s inspector general, Americans long have been aware of both the broad outlines and some abhorrent details of the Bush administration’s mistreatment of suspected terrorists after 9/11. We know that suspects were transported for questioning to “black sites” abroad, and that two suspected Al Qaeda operatives, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and Abu Zubaydah, were subjected to waterboarding. And we have read the memos in which Bush administration lawyers used contorted reasoning to justify torture.

But the Intelligence Committee’s 6,200-word report, based on a review of millions of pages of documents, contains additional accounts of abuse, including (according to a Washington Post report) the alleged repeated dunking of a terrorism suspect in tanks of ice water at a site in Afghanistan. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the Intelligence Committee chairwoman who aggressively has sought its declassification, said the report “exposes brutality that stands in stark contrast to our values as a nation.”

More important, those who have read the report say it concludes that waterboarding and other “enhanced interrogation techniques” yielded little valuable intelligence that couldn’t have been obtained by other means.

Last week the committee voted to declassify the report’s 480-page executive summary along with 20 findings and conclusions, but that represents only the beginning of the disclosure process. The executive branch will now determine which portions of the document must be redacted to protect sensitive national security information.

The Central Intelligence Agency has promised that it will do its part to ensure that the declassification review proceeds “expeditiously.” But the agency complained that a previous version of the report contained serious errors — a charge echoed by the committee’s Republican vice chair — and it has a vested interest in suppressing information that would sully its reputation. That is why the president, who has sent mixed signals about the importance of confronting the abuses of the past, must make thorough and timely declassification of this report a personal priority.

 

 

Tags: report, intelligence, committee, declassification, agency, committee,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
If the state of California had extra water, who or what should get it first?

Farmers
Natural habitat
Urban areas
Reservoirs
Don't know

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Obama heralds impact of power plant greenhouse gas limits
WASHINGTON — Calling it a moral obligation, President Barack Obama unveiled the final version of h..
Weather helps crews battling massive California wildfire
LOWER LAKE, Calif. — Cooler, wetter weather helped crews make inroads Monday against a massive Nor..
US auto sales strong in July on SUV, luxury demand
DETROIT — Summer deals and big demand for SUVs and luxury vehicles kept U.S. auto sales strong in ..
Former trader given 14 years prison for market manipulation
LONDON — A British judge sentenced a former Citibank and UBS trader to 14 years in prison Monday a..
Sen. Schumer, comedian Amy Schumer call for more gun control
NEW YORK — Stand-up comedian and actress Amy Schumer is teaming up with New York Sen. Charles Schu..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2015 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County legal notices