Tuesday
September
01
2015
11:30 pm
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 
Letter: Response to Aadahl
March 04, 2014, 05:00 AM Letter

Editor,

Once again Mr. Aadahl (Letter to the editor “Job loss nonsense” in the Feb. 22 edition of the Daily Journal) goes off on another wild unsubstantiated rant about employment actually increasing because of Obamacare. His conclusion based on a faulty premise is that “net result is less unemployment.”

If Mr. Aadahl would actually read the CBO’s report and subsequent clarifications, he might not take that position. The CBO said, on Feb. 10 in an FAQ report:

“Ultimately, we project that the number of jobs in the economy will be smaller than it would be in the absence of the ACA because some people will choose not to work at all, but CBO did not estimate the size of that change separately from the effect of people choosing to work fewer hours. We wrote in the report: “The reduction in CBO’s projections of hours worked represents a decline in the number of full-time-equivalent workers of about 2 million in 2017, rising to about 2.5 million in 2024 … The decline in full-time-equivalent employment stemming from the ACA will consist of some people not being employed at all and other people working fewer hours; however, CBO has not tried to quantify those two components of the overall effect.”

To be clear, total employment and hours worked will increase over the coming decade, but by less than they would have in the absence of the ACA.

So let’s forget about people leaving jobs to become poets and photographers and being replaced by other people. Net result is that there will be fewer hours worked in the American economy to the extent of 2 million equivalent full-time workers.

Joe Cioni

San Mateo

 

 

Tags: people, hours, about, fewer, report, employment,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
What do you think of the recent White House decision to change the name of Alaska's Mt. McKinley to Denali?

It's good to go back to what most people in Alaska call it
Never thought about it
We should keep the name McKinley
It's OK, but would be nice to find a different way to honor McKinley
How about keeping both names?

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
California to end unlimited isolation for most gang leaders
SACRAMENTO — California on Tuesday agreed to end its unlimited isolation of imprisoned gang leader..
Police in Illinois hunt for 3 suspects after officer killed
FOX LAKE, Ill. — Police with helicopters, dogs and armed with rifles were conducting a massive..
US stocks fall sharply on bleak Chinese manufacturing report
NEW YORK — Stocks plunged again Tuesday, continuing a rocky ride for Wall Street, after gloomy eco..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2015 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County blogs