Tuesday
September
16
2014
12:28 pm
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

OP-ED: Fundraising timeout would be good for California
February 27, 2014, 05:00 AM The Fresno Bee

No one reasonably expects to get money, and the influence of those who have it, out of politics.

But it is possible to slow the flow in the pipeline between campaign contributions, fundraising parties and legislation in California.

A fundraising blackout during the final, critical days of the legislative session would help.

A blackout is proposed as part of a package of four bills introduced last week by state Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Los Angeles, who is running for secretary of state.

Senate Bill 1101 would ban fundraising by legislators in the final 100 days of the legislative session and for seven days after the session ends. This is when much of the political pressure is applied on critical legislation such as the state budget and the high-stakes bills that generally appear in the last days of each session.

This time limit may be crucial to attracting support in the Senate or Assembly.

One of the main criticisms when fundraising blackouts were proposed in the past was that they would make it difficult for less affluent legislators to raise money for campaigns against wealthy challengers.

While that discounts the pricelessness of the incumbent’s advantage, it does deflate the argument because much of the year is open to soliciting funds.

The other three bills in the package would require that contributions of more than $100 be reported electronically within 24 hours of receipt if fewer than 90 days before an election, and within five days at any other time; would mandate the electronic reporting of campaign-funded communications within 24 hours; and would limit candidates from raising money for more than one seat at a time.

These are all good-government ideas, but the fundraising blackout offers the best potential to stop the proliferation of legalized corruption in the Capitol.

The case of lobbyist Kevin Sloat offers a good example of why.

Sloat was hit with a record fine — $133,500 — by the Fair Political Practices Commission this month for holding lavish fundraising parties at his house with fine cigars and finer wine that far exceeded the $500 limit for such events.

In announcing the bill package, Padilla said this would “reduce the likelihood of an unseemly overlap of public policy and campaign contributions.”

Presumably, he should know. He was one of 37 state lawmakers who received FPPC warning letters for holding political fundraisers at Sloat’s home — in Padilla’s case, during the legislative session.

Padilla’s proposal faces an uphill battle to get support. We wish him luck.

 

 

Tags: would, fundraising, session, state, blackout, package,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
Do you text while driving?

A few times
Only on occasion
All the time
Only at stop lights
No, and no one ever should

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Racing wildfire engulfs homes in California town
WEED — Dan Linville and his son were sitting in their living room when they smelled smoke. When th..
Self-driving cars now need a permit in California
LOS ANGELES — Computer-driven cars have been testing their skills on California roads for more tha..
Five suspected of South San Francisco attempted home burglary
South San Francisco police are seeking five suspects who tried to burglarize a home by shattering it..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County fictitious business name statements