12:57 am

  Local News
  State / National / World
  Opinion / Letters
  Arts / Entertainment
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  DJ Designers
  Advertise With Us
  About Us

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

OP-ED: State treasurer Bill Lockyer should not moonlight
December 27, 2013, 05:00 AM Contra Costa Times

We’re not clear if state Treasurer Bill Lockyer doesn’t have enough to do or he needs more money. Either way, his announcement this week that he will work part-time for a national law firm while serving the last year of his term should trouble all Californians.

The state treasurer chairs 14 state boards and 33 bond finance committees, he sits on 12 other key boards, and he is directly or indirectly responsible for the management of hundreds of billions of dollars.

The nation’s largest state deserves full-time officeholders at the top of the organizational chart, whether it’s, for example, the governor, the attorney general, the controller or treasurer. These are executive positions that hold far more than 40-hour-a-week responsibilities.

Californians should feel secure that those officials will give their undivided attention to their elected posts. And there should be no questions about conflicts of interest, or even the possible appearance of them.

That said, it’s also time to reconsider the salaries some statewide officeholders receive. The amounts are set by the California Citizens Compensation Commission. Some are way too low. Lockyer’s salary was just raised to $139,189 annually.

While that’s more than most of us earn, it pales in comparison to the income of private-sector executives with similar responsibilities. We don’t want to create a system where only those who are independently wealthy seek these critical statewide posts.

Although it’s wrong for Lockyer, 72, to take on outside employment, one can understand why he did so. He has spent more than 40 years in state elective office, including the last 15 as attorney general and treasurer. Yet, his financial disclosure statement for 2012 indicates that apart from his family’s Hayward home and a Long Beach rental unit, he owns only a mutual fund worth less than $10,000. This is not a wealthy man.

Lockyer announced last week that he was taking part-time work for an undisclosed salary with the Orange County office of the Brown Rudnick law firm. Nothing prevents him from moonlighting provided it presents no conflict. And Lockyer says it doesn’t because the firm does not lobby in California.

This is not the first time Lockyer has performed outside legal work while holding his current post. He and the Brown Rudnick news release insist the new job will not take time away from his state job. That’s hard to believe.

He should have waited until the end of his term, in a year. Meanwhile, the compensation commission should rethink the way it sets salaries for the state’s most-critical jobholders.



Tags: state, should, lockyer, treasurer, while,

Other stories from today:


Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
Return To Archives

Daily Journal Quick Poll
What do you think of Larry Ellison stepping down as CEO of Oracle?

It will still be his company
Time to pass the baton
It will give him more time for other pursuits
Don't care


Man wanted for lewd acts in San Mateo
San Mateo police are on the lookout for a man who may be connected to two lewd incidents this week n..
Alibaba surges in its stock market debut
NEW YORK — Alibaba's stock is surging as the Chinese e-commerce powerhouse begins its first day tr..
Unemployment rates rise in 24 U.S. states in August
WASHINGTON — Unemployment rates rose in nearly half of U.S. states in August, even as employers in..
Arrest made in fatal attack at South City gym
A South San Francisco man was arrested this morning after he allegedly beat another man to death at ..
More >>  
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
Millbrae news