Tuesday
September
01
2015
1:22 pm
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 
Letter: District Five
November 30, 2013, 05:00 AM Letter

Editor,

Sue Lempert’s column “Let’s Celebrate Election Day” (Nov. 4 edition of the Daily Journal) sees three years into the future. Unfazed by formidable statistics in District Five of San Mateo County, she predicts that the winner of the 2016 supervisor’s seat will be David Canepa.

Her analysis weighs the prospects of three future candidates and their chances to succeed Adrienne Tissier. They are David Canepa, Michael Guingona and Sal Torres — all incumbent Daly City councilmen. Guingona is Filipino American, Torres is Mexican American, Canepa is white. The racial makeup of the district’s population is 52 percent Asian, 18 percent Hispanic, 23 percent white and 4 percent black. The vast majority of the Asians are Filipino Americans.

Ms. Lempert concludes that despite the puny 23 percent share of the population, whites will be able to elect Canepa as District Five supervisor to succeed Tissier. That conclusion is based on past experience that shows the apathy of minorities toward the electoral processes. But past performance does not guarantee the same results for the future. The winds of change have come with the victory of Measure B.

As the result of the 2010 census, the racial minorities of San Mateo County became aware that they comprise 58 percent of the county’s population. Measure B won 58.5 percent of the votes despite the vehement opposition of four incumbent supervisors and U.S. Rep. Jackie Speier, D-San Mateo. Is that a statistical fluke or an indication that minorities have finally awakened?

Measure B got on the ballot because of a lawsuit against the county contending violations of the California Civil Rights Act.

Guy M. Guerrero

Burlingame

 

 

Tags: percent, canepa, mateo, county, population, future,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
What do you think of the recent White House decision to change the name of Alaska's Mt. McKinley to Denali?

It's good to go back to what most people in Alaska call it
Never thought about it
We should keep the name McKinley
It's OK, but would be nice to find a different way to honor McKinley
How about keeping both names?

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
California to end unlimited isolation for most gang leaders
SACRAMENTO — California on Tuesday agreed to end its unlimited isolation of imprisoned gang leader..
UNESCO chief: IS destruction of Syrian temple 'intolerable'
BEIRUT — Islamic State militants in Syria committed an "intolerable crime against civilization" by..
US stocks fall sharply on bleak Chinese manufacturing report
NEW YORK — Stocks plunged again Tuesday, continuing a rocky ride for Wall Street, after gloomy eco..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2015 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County name change notice