Wednesday
September
02
2015
3:35 am
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 
Letter: Laurel Way development threatens open space
September 23, 2013, 05:00 AM

Editor,

In 1966, my husband and I bought a little, forlorn house at the end of a dirt road, surrounded by heavily wooded, rolling open land.

Over the years, the Redwood City Council repeatedly rejected proposals to develop the site. I attended meeting after meeting where the council said “no;” the area was too fragile for development.

That made sense. Redwood City’s General Plan and California law protects natural, open space. Does this City Council think that cutting down all the trees, putting in a two-level road, and 16 large houses will be an improvement?

The hillsides are steep — constantly moving, and there is a creek that runs through the site, eroding the hillsides. People living below the site have reason to fear that landslides will result from the massive digging, grading and fill this project requires. How would nearby residents survive five years of continuous construction? I would be forced out of my home by constant noise and dust, not to mention the lack of access during construction of the road. 

Turning a natural open site that can be restored into a crowded subdivision would constitute a failure of municipal government that is supposed to serve and protect its residents. 

At my age (I’ll turn 90 in a few weeks), the destruction wrought by this project will be more than I can bear. After 47 years, I’ve became intertwined with the little house, the tall trees, the beautiful hillsides and even the deer. And, now I may have to leave it.

Jane Hanigan

Redwood City

 

 

Tags: redwood, council, hillsides, years, would,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
What do you think of the recent White House decision to change the name of Alaska's Mt. McKinley to Denali?

It's good to go back to what most people in Alaska call it
Never thought about it
We should keep the name McKinley
It's OK, but would be nice to find a different way to honor McKinley
How about keeping both names?

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
California to end unlimited isolation for most gang leaders
SACRAMENTO — California on Tuesday agreed to end its unlimited isolation of imprisoned gang leader..
Police in Illinois hunt for 3 suspects after officer killed
FOX LAKE, Ill. — Police with helicopters, dogs and armed with rifles were conducting a massive..
US stocks fall sharply on bleak Chinese manufacturing report
NEW YORK — Stocks plunged again Tuesday, continuing a rocky ride for Wall Street, after gloomy eco..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2015 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County marketing