Friday
October
24
2014
4:25 am
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

OP-ED: Judge should halt California’s high-speed rail
August 22, 2013, 05:00 AM Contra Costa Times

Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Michael Kenny’s 16-page ruling issued last Friday exposes the fraud perpetuated by the California High-Speed Rail Authority.

Voters set restrictions in 2008 when they supported linking major metropolitan areas of the state: Money must be secured and environmental reviews completed before the authority authorizes expenditures.

Kenny concludes it failed to clear either hurdle. The authority “abused its discretion by approving a funding plan that did not comply with the requirements of the law.”

For years now, Gov. Jerry Brown and his puppet leading the authority board, Dan Richard, have been perpetrating a bait-and-switch on Californians. Voters were promised a system from San Diego to Sacramento at a cost of $45 billion. Today, the project optimistically stands at $69 billion, but would link only San Francisco with Los Angeles.

Anticipated ticket prices have increased more than 50 percent, ridership projections have been cut by more than half, the opening date has been pushed back nine years to 2029, and the two-hour-and-40-minute mandated travel time from San Francisco to Los Angeles remains doubtful.

That’s why the authority has never lined up private-sector money promised to make the project pencil out. Moreover, critical federal funding remains a fantasy that relies on an entirely different political environment in Washington.

In short, the plan is a financial wreck. But authority board members, with the narrow approval of the Legislature, continue to push ahead — even though polls show voters would reject the 2008 measure today.

The first planned segment would stretch from Fresno to just north of Bakersfield. But, as most recognize, that would be of little use unless the line is extended either north to San Jose or south to the San Fernando Valley.

Kenny ruled that the measure voters approved required the authority before starting work to line up money for a “usable segment” — “to identify sources of funds that were more than merely theoretically possible, but instead were reasonably expected to be actually available when needed.”

The authority’s own financing plan, the judge ruled, “makes it absolutely clear that there is, in reality, no reasonably anticipated time of receipt for any of the potential new federal funds.”

As for environmental review, Kenny concluded that also should have been completed for the entire usable segment before approval of the spending plan. That didn’t happen.

Having concluded that the authority abused its discretion, Kenny will next decide what to do about it. The answer: Apply the brakes.

 

 

Tags: authority, kenny, would, voters, before, money,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
What is the most important issue facing the United States right now?

Ebola
Islamic State
Income gap
Russia/Ukraine
Immigration
Health care
The economy

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
White House fence jumper charged with assault
WASHINGTON — The 23-year-old Maryland man who climbed over the White House fence Wednesday night h..
Senators ask gov't for nationwide air bag recall
DETROIT — Two U.S. senators are calling on regulators to issue a nationwide recall of cars with fa..
Brazilian companies raise Chiquita offer to $681M
NEW YORK — Brazilian companies Cutrale and Safra said they are again raising their bid for banana ..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County employment ads