Wednesday
October
22
2014
11:06 pm
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

OP-Ed: Beware expedient state budget gimmicks
August 02, 2013, 05:00 AM Riverside Press-Enterprise

A court ruling last week serves as a reminder that even rejected state budget gimmicks can haunt taxpayers for years. Legislators should recognize that the best way to avoid trouble from such dubious schemes is to avoid those reckless ploys altogether. California needs honest budgets, not spending plans built on shortsighted expedients.

A Superior Court judge last week gave the green light to a lawsuit against the state over an abandoned budget gimmick from three years ago. A group that wanted to buy 11 state office buildings sued the state for breach of contract in 2011, after incoming Gov. Jerry Brown scuttled the sale. Last week’s ruling rejected the state’s push to dismiss the lawsuit, and allowed the plaintiffs to seek damages from the state.

The fight stems from a 2010 plan to sell 11 state-owned office buildings to private buyers, then lease the space back long-term. The $2.3 billion deal would have included $1.2 billion up front to help the state general fund bridge another in a series of huge, multibillion dollar shortfalls. Brown killed the plan after the state’s legislative analyst said taxpayers would have lost $646 million on the deal just in the first two decades.

The possibility that taxpayers might end up paying for this scrapped scheme anyway is simply galling. And the experience should serve as yet one more warning about the dangers of budget schemes that trade immediate gain for much greater long-term pain. Plugging budget holes now by piling up huge future expenses is an approach guaranteed to keep state finances in perpetual jeopardy.

Stabilizing state finances requires legislators to bring spending and tax receipts into ongoing balance. Anything else only postpones an honest fiscal reckoning.

And the state has no need to spend money defending dubious budget ploys in court. California can avoid those legal battles — if legislators will only abandon reckless fiscal schemes.

 

 

Tags: state, budget, court, avoid, schemes, legislators,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
Does the terrorist attack near the Canadian Parliament concern you?

Yes, extremely
Yes, somewhat
A little
Not at all

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Giants fans be wary, man robbed of World Series tickets worth $1,000
With the World Series hot on San Francisco Giants’ fans minds, police are reminding people to be w..
Two dead in shooting attack at Canada's Parliament
OTTAWA, Ontario — A gunman with a scarf over his face shot to death a Canadian soldier standin..
US to track everyone coming from Ebola nations
WASHINGTON — Stepping up their vigilance against Ebola, federal authorities said Wednesday that ev..
Government ups air bag warning to 7.8M vehicles
DETROIT — The U.S. government is telling 3 million more car owners to get their air bags repaired ..
Turkish president says US airdrop to Kurds in Kobani a mistake
ISTANBUL — Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan says that the U.S. made a mistake in airdropping..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County garage sales