Thursday
August
21
2014
1:14 am
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

Housing solution
June 25, 2013, 05:00 AM

Editor,

The state-mandated requirement to pack an additional 2,000 housing units in my already saturated city — with similar additional housing around the Bay Area — is simply unrealistic.

But here’s a solution: We can make room for additional housing by using the property that churches occupy (eminent domain). I counted 41 churches recently. That seemed to be a high number for a population of only 62,000 souls. Taking over church (synagogue, mosque, etc.) property and using it for more state-mandated housing would be an ideal way to meet our requirement (An Internet search reveals that less than 20 percent of our population attend religious services, so no big deal).

Further, by adopting time-share arrangements, eliminating 36 religious houses would not cause any significant disruptions of the activities of those amongst us who wish to continue their other-world practices. This is because in the remaining houses of worship, services could be stacked. That is, first service of the day could be reserved for Baptists, followed by Methodists, Catholics, etc. Every six months, the congregations could move up a notch, and last of the day during the first half year would become first during the following period. The beauty of this arrangement would be that soon, the various groups will realize that we’re all the same, and we’ll naturally choose to become friends, and even intermarry. Talk about a happy, diversified Bay Area. And Palo Alto can be the start of something big. Surely this same plan will be used throughout the Bay Area.

Ruben Contreras

Palo Alto

 

 

Tags: housing, would, first, additional, could,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
Is it fair for the state to fine water wasters when broken and leaky pipes are losing billions of gallons?

Yes. Those are two different problems.
No. The state needs to gets its infrastructure in order first.
Yes but the pipes need fixing, too.
Would you expect anything else from government?

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Bank of America reaches $17B settlement with U.S.
WASHINGTON — Bank of America has reached a record $17 billion settlement to resolve an investigati..
Obama: U.S. won’t stop confronting Islamic State
WASHINGTON — The United States stood firm Wednesday in its fight against Islamic State militants w..
South San Francisco to be fogged for West Nile Thursday night
Mosquitoes infected with West Nile virus have spread to South San Francisco and prompted San Mateo ..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County marketing