6:46 pm

  Local News
  State / National / World
  Opinion / Letters
  Arts / Entertainment
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  DJ Designers
  Advertise With Us
  About Us

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

Election recount bill introduced: California would fund tally triggered by close races
August 08, 2014, 05:00 AM By Michelle Durand Daily Journal

Kevin Mullin

The state of California would foot the bill for future election recounts triggered by close races under proposed legislation introduced Thursday by Assemblyman Kevin Mullin, D-South San Francisco.

The Peninsula lawmaker announced plans for such a law during the legislative recess and followed through yesterday by gutting an existing Senate bill. The proposed bill would require a state-funded recount when the difference between second and third place is one-tenth of 1 percent.

Mullin saw the need for change after state controller candidate John Perez, a termed-out Los Angeles assemblyman, sparked a recount in the June primary results. The race highlighted issues that are long due for fixing, according to Mullin.

“Fourteen years after Bush v. Gore and the Florida fiasco, California still has an antiquated system for recounts and it needs reform,” Mullin said.

Only 481 votes separated second-place finisher Betty T. Yee and Perez in third place. The two top vote-getters face off in November so the recount was to decide who would run against Fresno Mayor Ashley Swearengin.

The recount, funded by Perez, began but he called it off after only acquiring a handful of new votes.

The effort spurred discussions about reforming the existing rules governing recounts. As it stands, candidates wanting a recount pick up the tab and choose which counties and in what order they want the manual tally done. The opponent can then do the same if votes are lost, hypothetically going back and forth until all votes are counted or money is exhausted.

Each county also has its own tallying policies, creating a patchwork approach rather than a uniform system. In Perez’s case, San Mateo County made his list and was due to begin counting after San Bernadino and Fresno counties finished. Perez killed the effort before that time came.

Had Mullin’s bill been in place at the time of the June primary, an automatic recount would have occurred. One-tenth of 1 percent pencils out to about 5,000 votes in a primary and 10,000 votes in a general election. The 481 votes between Perez and Yee is equal to one-hundredth of 1 percent.

Mullin acknowledged the state will spend about $1.9 million per recount but noted it would rarely be used. For example, he said, the June controller race is the only one in the last 20 years decided by a margin less than one-hundredth of 1 percent.

Besides, he said the cost is worth the results.

“It’s a modest price to pay to give voters confidence that the right winners will be chosen in an election. It’s a fail-safe kind of measure rarely utilized,” Mullin said.

The cost and counties’ ability to finish a primary recount before a November general election are the most likely concerns to be raised, he said.

Twenty states already have some form of publicly funded recount mechanism, he said.

“We should be 21,” he said.

Assembly Bill 2194 has an urgency clause so if adopted would take effect in time for the November 2014 California general election. Such a clause requires a two-thirds threshold but Mullin said he’s shooting high to get the changes sooner rather than later.

“I’d like to get it in place while Perez is still in the building and people are reminded how this process didn’t work properly and why we need reform,” he said.

Mullin is not stopping at reforming the state recount procedures. His office is also looking at crafting a process for presidential elections in time for 2016.

(650) 344-5200 ext. 102



Tags: recount, mullin, votes, would, perez, state,

Other stories from today:

San Mateo County police reports
Half Moon Bay hires new city manager: Magda Gonzalez coming to coast from East Palo Alto
Stowaway arrested again at Los Angeles airport

Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
Return To Archives

Daily Journal Quick Poll
What do you think of the proposal to charge a toll for walkers and bikers on the Golden Gate Bridge?

It's good, why should they get to cross it free?
Don't care
A terrible idea
What's next? Charging us to look at it?


Giants fans be wary, man robbed of World Series tickets worth $1,000
With the World Series hot on San Francisco Giants’ fans minds, police are reminding people to be w..
Two dead in shooting attack at Canada's Parliament
OTTAWA, Ontario — A gunman with a scarf over his face shot to death a Canadian soldier standin..
US to track everyone coming from Ebola nations
WASHINGTON — Stepping up their vigilance against Ebola, federal authorities said Wednesday that ev..
Government ups air bag warning to 7.8M vehicles
DETROIT — The U.S. government is telling 3 million more car owners to get their air bags repaired ..
Turkish president says US airdrop to Kurds in Kobani a mistake
ISTANBUL — Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan says that the U.S. made a mistake in airdropping..
More >>  
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County advertising