Saturday
August
29
2015
10:50 pm
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 
One-third of grand jury ideas implemented
July 22, 2014, 05:00 AM By Michelle Durand Daily Journal

A little over one-third of last year’s civil grand jury recommendations were actually implemented but the subjects of those reports said they also planned to act on an equal number of suggestions.

In a breakdown of the previous year’s reports, the current civil grand jury found that 71 percent of the 106 total recommendations were either made or in the works, 27 percent were denied and 2 percent were slated for further study.

The numbers from the 2012-13 jury year were released Monday.

Grand jury reports carry no legal weight but recipients are required to respond in writing within 90 days. According to the summary, the agencies and individuals targeted were pretty good at getting back to the jury; they just didn’t always agree with the suggestions.

The 2012-13 jury tackled a wide variety of subjects, ranging from water recycling by cities and multilingual access by law enforcement to the county’s unfunded liabilities and structural deficit and the oversight of special districts.

In some case, the recommendations were not applicable, according to the replies. For example, San Mateo County said it has no areas consistent with the recycled water study and several cities said they had no water treatment facility to support such a program.

Providing smartphones to police officers to access free translation services isn’t fiscally reasonable for some jurisdictions while others say they already use in-car computers.

The county implemented some changes to its budget documents to improve transparency and clarity for the public at the request of the grand jury. But when it came to urging the Local Agency Formation Commission to review the San Mateo County Mosquito and Vector Control District, it replied there is no jurisdiction. From that same report evaluating special district oversight — particularly that district following a half-million dollar embezzlement — the mosquito district said it had already implemented changes to how the manager is evaluated, created new committees and planned to contract out for human resources support.

The sitting civil grand jury always generates an annual report on the previous year’s efforts but the document released yesterday includes an expanded format. The jury also asks that next panel issue its summary of reports and responses by the end of January.

The full summary report is available at www.sanmateocourt.org/grandjury.

michelle@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 102

 

 

Tags: grand, district, reports, percent, county, water,


Other stories from today:

Fruit sold at Costco, Trader Joe’s recalled
Coastal burglar takes plea deal
Company dominates the track and field construction industry: Family-owned South City company has been around for 36 years
 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
Do you think Joe Biden should run for president?

Yes, I like him
Yes, it will give Hillary Clinton some competition
Only if Clinton's campaign starts failing
No, it will distract from Clinton's campaign
No, I don't like him
Doesn't matter, I'm voting Republican

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Highway 101 in Burlingame open after power line repair
THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE: Highway 101 is open in both directions with one lane on the northbou..
Storm dissipates after killing at least 20 in Caribbean
HAVANA — Tropical Storm Erika dissipated early Saturday, even as its remnants began drenching part..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2015 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County fictitious business name statements