Friday
December
19
2014
4:15 am
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 
Bill would ban charging fee for removing mug shots
April 29, 2014, 05:00 AM The Associated Press

Jerry Hill

SACRAMENTO — California would prohibit businesses from charging a fee to take mug shots off their websites under a bill that passed out of the state Senate on Monday.

Sen. Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, said websites that extract and compile criminal record information from police and sheriff’s departments have proliferated in recent years. These sites charge hundreds or even thousands of dollars to have people’s booking photos removed whether or not a person was actually charged or convicted, he said.

“This is extortion, plain and simple,” Hill said.

SB1027 passed the Senate on a 34-0 vote. It now moves to the Assembly.

Hill quoted figures from the state attorney general’s office saying more than 930,000 Californians were arrested in 2011. Yet more than half of them were never convicted or had the charges dropped.

It’s likely all those people have their mug shots online, Hill said.

According to Hill’s office, such commercial websites have turned a public service into a profit by charging substantial fees to have information removed. There have been instances where people have lost work because their booking photo for suspicion of driving under the influence was posted online even though the charge was ultimately dropped.

Five other states including Georgia, Illinois, Oregon, Texas, and Utah already have banned fees for removing mug shots. An additional 14 states are now considering similar legislation.

California’s bill is being backed by some law enforcement groups such as the Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs.

In addition to the ban, the bill imposes a fine of up to $1,000 or the cost of damages, whichever is greater.

There’s no known opposition so far.

 

 

Tags: shots, their, websites,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
Do you think police officers should wear body cameras?

Yes, it will help with accountability
Yes, it will help reduce complaints
Yes, but it's not a panacea
No, too costly
No need

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County blogs