Wednesday
September
03
2014
12:15 am
Weather

  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

Millbrae updating massage ordinance: City to require one state certificate, not two
July 11, 2013, 05:00 AM By Sally Schilling Daily Journal

Massage practitioners in Millbrae may no longer have to attain multiple government certifications, if the City Council votes to update its massage ordinance later this month.

Massage therapists currently must get a state certificate and a city permit, because Millbrae has yet to update its code to align with the more recently established state licensing requirements.

In 2009, the passage of Senate Bill 731 mandated that practitioners obtain state certificate from the California Massage Therapy Council.

Meanwhile, Millbrae’s massage ordinance, which was last amended in 2002, still requires each massage therapist to get a permit from the police department.

The massage therapists must deal with dual permits, and both the state and the city of Millbrae are charged with running background checks on them.

But the City Council introduced an amendment Tuesday that would update the city’s Bathing and Massage Ordinance to reflect state law, making the California Massage Therapy Council the sole entity charged with issuing licenses and conducting the background checks of the practitioners.

City officials say the state laws and system of background checks have proven to be more effective than the city’s outdated ordinance.

The state law clearly defines what the businesses should be doing, said Millbrae Mayor Gina Papan.

Finding an appropriate legal approach to massage parlors is important to the city because the businesses can sometimes be used as fronts for prostitution.

“Every city walks a fine line in that massages — personally, I like them — but the businesses themselves can be a cover for illegal activity,” said Papan.

Running background checks at the state level instead of at the municipal level ensures illegitimate practitioners are not hopping from city to city, she said.

“It will give us another resource if an individual comes in and has less-than-legal activities in mind,” she said.

The city waited several years after the passage of the state law before considering updating city code because it wanted to see if there would be any subsequent changes to the legislation, said Ed Barberini, chief of police services for the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office Millbrae Bureau. Now, he said, the city is confident that the state has established strong, lasting legislation.

“We think the timing is right,” said Barberini. “We believe that this [current amendment] will be consistent with state level in the future.”

The proposed change to Millbrae’s massage ordinance would not provide any new investigative tool to law enforcement, but would update the city’s code to reflect the state statute, he said.

“Our enforcement regarding illegal activities doesn’t change,” he said.

To obtain a state certification from the California Massage Therapy Council, practitioners must submit an application, transcripts from approved massage schools, go through a background check and pay $150 fee. Practitioners must get recertified every two years.

The current Millbrae application process requires submitting a detailed work history and going through a background check annually with the police department.

The City Council will vote on the amendment to the massage ordinance at its July 23 meeting. If the city approves the amendment, massage business establishments would still be required to register with the city.

 

 

Tags: massage, state, millbrae, background, ordinance,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
The CPUC decided to fine PG&E $1.4 billion for the 2010 San Bruno explosion and fire, with almost $1 billion going directly to the state's general fund. What do you think?

Totally agree with it
Agree, but think the entire fine should go to pipeline improvements
Think it should be more
Think it's too much
Disagree, but think the entire fine should go to pipeline improvements

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
PG&E fined $1.4B for deadly 2010 gas line blast
SAN FRANCISCO — California regulatory judges issued a $1.4 billion penalty on Tuesday against the ..
Video purports to show beheading of U.S. journalist
BEIRUT — An Internet video posted online Tuesday purported to show the beheading of U.S. journalis..
U.S. home prices rose at slower pace in July
WASHINGTON — U.S. home prices rose in July but at a slower rate compared with earlier this year. T..
U.S. manufacturing grows at fastest pace in 3½ years
WASHINGTON — U.S. manufacturing grew in August at the strongest pace in more than three years as f..
U.S. construction spending up 1.8 percent in July
WASHINGTON — U.S. construction spending staged a strong rebound in July, rising by the largest amo..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2014 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Carlos news