10:55 am

  Local News
  State / National / World
  Opinion / Letters
  Arts / Entertainment
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  DJ Designers
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
Tesla selects Nevada for battery plant
September 04, 2014, 05:00 AM The Associated Press

RENO, Nev. — Tesla Motors has chosen Nevada as the site for a massive, $5 billion factory that will pump out car batteries for a new generation of less-expensive electric vehicles, a person familiar with the company’s plans said Wednesday.

The person, who spoke on condition of anonymity because no official announcement was made, said work soon will resume at an industrial park outside Reno. Nevada still must approve a package of incentives Tesla negotiated.

Four other states — California, Texas, Arizona and New Mexico — were vying for the project and the estimated 6,500 jobs it will bring.

Tesla needs what it calls the “gigafactory” to make cheaper batteries for its Model 3, a mass-market electric car the company hopes to sell by 2017 for around $35,000. Currently, Tesla offers only the Model S sedan, which starts at $70,000.

Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval’s office said only that he would make a “major economic development announcement” Thursday afternoon. A spokesman for Tesla, based in Palo Alto, California, said company representatives would be at the Capitol in Carson City for the announcement but offered no other details.

Tesla has done site-preparation work at the Reno Tahoe Industrial Center but had not publicly committed to building in Nevada, instead waiting as other states put together their best packages of economic incentives.

This spring, Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced that the company would take the extremely unusual step of spending millions to prepare sites in two states — or perhaps even three — before choosing a winner.

The person familiar with Tesla’s plans told The Associated Press a second site still will be prepared, in case Nevada is unable to deliver the incentives it has promised — or possibly to build a second factory.

Sandoval has declined to discuss any incentives he has offered during negotiations with Tesla. Based on Musk’s public statements of what he expects a winning bid would be worth, the incentive package likely will total at least $500 million.

The governor would have to call a special session of the Legislature to approve tax breaks, grants or other incentives of that magnitude.

Nevada economic development laws allow several incentive programs, including abatements on personal property, sales and business taxes, and sales tax deferrals, according to the Legislative Counsel Bureau. But any changes or additions would require legislative action, and Nevada’s biennial Legislature won’t convene again until Feb. 2, 2015.

Aside from low tax rates and business-friendly workplace laws, Nevada’s other advantages include plenty of sun and wind to generate the “green” power that Tesla wanted, and relative proximity to the company’s car manufacturing plant in the San Francisco Bay Area.

The industrial park 15 miles east of Reno also is near a deposit of lithium, an essential element to produce the battery cells.

Tesla will pay about half of the factory’s cost. The other major investor is Panasonic, which will manufacture the lithium-ion battery cells and invest in equipment.

Lance Gilman, principal and director of the Reno Tahoe Industrial Center, said he had not been told of a final decision.

“It would be the most exciting news of the century to me,” he said.

At 167 square miles of high desert, the industrial park says it is the nation’s largest — befitting of such a large factory. Tesla has said it would need about 10 million square feet, an area equivalent to about 174 football fields.

Competition has been intense among the states, which have bid up their incentive packages in private negotiations with Tesla.

Some politicians in California, the state where Musk founded not just Tesla but PayPal and commercial space exploration firm SpaceX, made winning the gigafactory a point of pride.

“Tesla is a California-born company that the state has invested heavily in, and we want it to succeed,” Sen. Ted Gaines, R-Roseville, said in a written statement. “It makes complete sense for it to expand right here, close to its headquarters, yet they are headed out of state.”

He called Tesla’s decision a “clear indictment of our business climate.”

California Gov. Jerry Brown had signaled he would work with Tesla to ease environmental review requirements that would have made building the plant in a few years impossible. Brook Taylor, a spokesman for Brown’s economic development agency, said he could not immediately comment.



Tags: tesla, would, nevada, other, incentives, industrial,

Other stories from today:

Behind Big Macs, a drama over corporate control
Tech stocks drag Wall Street lower
Booming crossover SUV sales trigger car discounts

Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
Return To Archives

Daily Journal Quick Poll
Are you concerned about sea level rise?

Yes, very much so
No, not at all
A little bit
Glad others are
More concerned about the environment overall


US stocks take a tumble on weak company earnings, US economic data
A double-whammy hit U.S. stocks early Tuesday, when disappointing earnings from big-name companies a..
US consumer confidence jumps to 7 ½-year high in January
WASHINGTON — U.S. consumers welcomed the new year with a surge in confidence. The Conference Bo..
East Coast snow prompts SFO flight cancellations
The snowstorm on the nation's east coast has prompted the cancellation of 36 departures and 49 arriv..
More >>  
©2015 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County courts