Thursday
September
02
2010
11:42 am
Weather
  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Special
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Community Forum
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us

The print edition in its entirety. Click here to see it. (Updated every day at 4pm PST.)

Click here for locations of where to find Daily Journal news racks.

VISIT US ON FACEBOOK! Click here

Follow us on Twitter!

County wants clues about chloramine
December 03, 2004, 12:00 AM Daily Journal staff report
County officials are joining the call for some definitive answers on chloramine, a drinking water additive on the Peninsula that some residents link to coughs, rashes and other pervasive medical conditions.

The Board of Supervisors will vote next week to support the San Francisco Department of Public Health’s request for a formal position on the additive by the California Conference of Local Health Officers. The local resolution carries little legal weight, but it may bolster the health department’s demands.

Chlorine and ammonia

Chloramine is the combination of chlorine and ammonia and is used as a disinfectant in the public water supply. The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission — which oversees the Hetch Hetchy water system along the Peninsula — switched from chlorine to chloramine Feb. 1 to comply with stricter environmental standards. Chlorine kills germs but isn’t considered as effective or long-lasting as chloramine. Opponents, though, have publicly questioned if the change left the system of 2.4 million customers more at risk.

Chloramine can harm kidney dialysis patients, fish in aquariums and businesses or industries that use treated water. The ongoing questions about chloramine’s safety led the county to dive into the controversy.

“We believe an impartial, medical evaluation of chloramine is warranted,” said Mark Church, president of the Board of Supervisors. “Although chloramine has been around for decades, the extent to which it is potentially harmful to certain people is still unknown.

Kidney patients can drink, cook and bathe with the water but it is not safe for them to have the water be part of their dialysis treatment. The human body neutralizes chloramine by the digestive process but cannot when the water goes straight into the blood stream. The water similarly affects fish, amphibians and some reptiles. The chloramine binds to the iron in red blood cells, reducing the ability to carry oxygen. Chloramine is toxic to both fresh and salt water fish.

Resolution

Church and board Vice President Rich Gordon will ask the other supervisors Tuesday to support their resolution. The two sit on the board’s water subcommittee. Gordon cautioned the request for a formal investigation shouldn’t imply the additive is necessarily dangerous to the masses.

“We are not saying that chloramine is unsafe. We don’t know and therein lies the problem,” Gordon said. Some cities receiving water from Hetch Hetchy held public meetings on chloramine in the past year. In May, Millbrae residents grilled a science consultant hired by the city. She said chloramine is safe although often confused with Chloramine-T, a different compound, by worried residents.


Email to Friend Send a Letter to the Editor  |  Email to Friend Post your comment  |  Email to Friend  Print this Page Print this Page Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
You are in the Archives

Exit
  RSS feed RSS
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
What do you think of a group of Atherton residents suing the Sequoia Union High School District about a proposal to put in temporary lights at Menlo-Atherton High School so they can have night football games?

Night football games are fun and build community spirit, they should relax.
Night football games bring traffic, noise, people and headaches.
They're temporary, why not wait and see how it goes?
 
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
©2010 Daily Journal - San Mateo County's homepage