Friday
November
20
2009
7:07 pm
Weather
 
  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Special
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Community Forum
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us

Do you Facebook? Become a fan of the Daily Journal. Click here.

Follow us on Twitter!

Advertise in the ONLY locally-owned daily newspaper in San Mateo County.

Sheriff should answer questions or resign
April 25, 2007, 12:00 AM
San Mateo County Sheriff Greg Munks and Undersheriff Carlos Bolanos suffered from a severe lapse in judgment when they decided to visit a Las Vegas home in pursuit of what Munks said was a “massage” he needed since he was sore from a run.

Both were at the home when it was raided for being an illegal house of prostitution. Bolanos, who was not inside the home, told a television reporter he recognized it was questionable and was in the course of leaving when police arrived. The raid reportedly took place at 9:30 p.m. and both were driving in a limousine through the industrial/residential area approximately a mile from the Vegas strip.

A naive citizen could say it is a mistake going to a house for a massage, but Munks and Bolanos are not naive citizens. They are San Mateo County’s top two law enforcement officials. It is their job to recognize places where questionable activity may occur and Munks should have not only never stopped at the home, but never entered once he arrived.

Surely, there are other places to get a massage in Las Vegas that are not questionable — like at hotel spas. But that is only if you believe this flimsy story.

Normally, a situation like this should not warrant a news story since whatever public officials do in private should remain so, but two top law enforcement officials should know better. And reading an apology from a prepared statement without taking questions or deflecting inquiries to a public information officer who should in no way be involved in this situation is wrong.

Why were they at the house? Where were they staying? Were they intoxicated? When exactly did they perceive the situation was questionable? As law enforcement officials, aren’t they trained in noticing what brothels might look like? Who paid for the trip?

The sheriff and the undersheriff should immediately hold a press conference and answer each and every growing question that is in the public’s minds or resign immediately.

While no law may have been broken, the public trust was.


Email to Friend Send a Letter to the Editor  |  Email to Friend Post your comment  |  Email to Friend Email to Friend  |  Print this Page Print this Page
<< Back
 
You are in the Archives

Exit
  RSS feed RSS
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
What is the best new phrase of the year now recognized by the New Oxford American Dictionary?

Unfriend: To remove someone as a friend (on a social networking site)
Intexticated: Distracted while texting and driving
Tramp stamp: A tattoo on the lower back, usually on a woman
Funemployed: People taking advantage of newly unemployed status to have fun
Sexting: Sending of sexually explicit messages and pictures by cellphone
 
 
  
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
©2009 Daily Journal - San Mateo County's homepage