Wednesday
February
10
2016
12:28 am
Weather
 
  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
 
 
 
Rail authority seeking grant money for Peninsula segment
August 04, 2010, 02:54 AM By Bill Silverfarb Daily Journal


The California High-Speed Rail Authority is preparing four separate federal grant applications to help jump-start construction on parts of the project, including the San Francisco to San Jose segment of the line.

The authority has until Aug. 6 to prepare the applications, a day after its next scheduled board meeting when it will decide which alternative to pursue on the Peninsula, one with 26 miles of trenches or tunnels and one with more aerial options.

The Peninsula Rail Program’s Bob Doty is scheduled to present the two alternatives to the board Thursday, although the documents will not be made public until Thursday morning. The Peninsula Rail Program is the local arm of the High-Speed Rail Authority that also answers to Caltrain.

Burlingame Mayor Cathy Baylock will attend the board meeting and is under the impression the authority has opted to build an aerial structure through her city.

"We do not want an aerial structure dividing our community,” Baylock said. "It is premature at this point to eliminate the trenched option until a complete environmental study is conducted. To dismiss the option is not following the law.”

The city just participated in the Peninsula Rail Program’s Context Sensitive Solutions, in which an overwhelming number of Burlingame residents said they preferred a trench or tunnel over an elevated structure. CSS was intended to allow for greater community input on the project.

"We just went through months of this process and within weeks they are dismissing our input,” Baylock said.

Baylock, Belmont Mayor Christine Wozniak and other Peninsula mayors who formed the Peninsula Cities Consortium received a letter from the Bay Area Council last week critical of their efforts.

"In the case of high-speed rail, a small handful of individuals in a small handful of neighborhoods in a small handful of communities raise a seemingly endless series of complaints and objections and threaten to halt the construction of a project of generational significance, and immediate economic survival, for this state and its residents,” council President Jim Wunderman said in the letter.

Wunderman said the group had "obstructionist policies” that put the project in "grave danger.” The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored, public-policy advocacy organization for the nine-county Bay Area.

But Baylock said her job is simply to represent the views of Burlingame’s residents.

"Our position is to continue looking at the underground option,” Baylock said.

The authority’s new chief executive officer, Roelof van Ark, said at a committee meeting last week that the San Francisco to San Jose segment of the line has been given cost estimates "only” as an elevated or aerial structure.

The authority is seeking between $700 million and $1 billion for electrification of the Caltrain line and the construction of a new transit station in Millbrae in its grant application due Aug. 6.

Authority Boardmember Quentin Kopp made it clear yesterday, however, that the board has yet to decide on which option to pursue on the Peninsula and that cost estimates would not be solid for whatever option the board pursues until the fall.

"It won’t be completely tunneled and it won’t be completely aerial,” Kopp said. "We are still dealing with two sets of alternatives. We have to consider what is feasible.”

The authority will also seek separate grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation for track and signaling work on the Merced to Fresno section; track and signaling work in the Bakersfield to Fresno section; and track and other infrastructure on the Los Angeles to Anaheim section.

The rail authority is planning a route with electrified bullet trains traveling from Los Angeles to San Francisco and has been criticized for speedily getting the project shovel-ready to secure more federal funding. The project was awarded $2.5 billion in federal funding in May and state voters approved a nearly $10 billion bond in a November 2008 election to build the project. The estimated cost is expected to be more than $40 billion, although, critics say that number could double.


The California High-Speed Rail Authority meets 9 a.m., Thursday, Milton Marks Conference Center, 455 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco.


Bill Silverfarb can be reached by e-mail: silverfarb@smdailyjournal.com or by phone: (650) 344-5200 ext. 106.

 

 

Tags: authority, peninsula, project, baylock,


Other stories from today:

 

 
Print this Page Print this Page  |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
Return To Archives
 
  


 
 
 
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
In one month, the stock market will be ...

Much lower
Lower
About the same
Higher
Much higher

 

 
San Mateo Community College District
 
 
 
Trump, Sanders victorious in New Hampshire primaries
MANCHESTER, N.H. — Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Bernie Sanders swept to victory in Tue..
Mavericks takes off Friday: Big wave surf contest confirmed in Half Moon Bay
It’s official — El Niño has provided and the Titans will descend.Organizers and forecasters wit..
California farmers reap record sales in record drought
FRESNO — A new state report shows California farmers reaping record sales despite the epic drought..
Obama sends Congress record $4.1 trillion 2017 spending plan
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama sent Congress on Tuesday his eighth and final budget, proposin..
Intelligence chief: North Korea restarts plutonium reactor
WASHINGTON — North Korea has expanded a uranium enrichment facility and restarted a plutonium reac..
More >>  
 
 
  
 
  
 
©2016 San Mateo Daily Journal
San Mateo County DBA