Tuesday
February
09
2010
12:05 pm
Weather
 
  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Special
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  Classifieds
  DJ Designers
  Community Forum
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us

Do you Facebook? Become a fan of the Daily Journal. Click here.

Follow us on Twitter!

Advertise in the ONLY locally-owned daily newspaper in San Mateo County.

Homeowners oppose development
October 05, 2009, 10:37 PM By Bill Silverfarb
A 25-unit proposed development in unincorporated San Mateo is facing fierce opposition from the Baywood Park Homeowners’ Association over what the group calls the potential for “lethal dust clouds” during construction.

The group delivered a 22-page report to the San Mateo County Planning Commission detailing what it calls inefficiencies in the draft environmental impact report.  

The DEIR failed to reveal full information on impacts of enormous grading and thousands of truck trips to tear out area hilltop which will result in excessive truck traffic and dangerously degraded air quality levels, Dr. Gerard Ozanne said.

Ozanne is president of the Baywood Park Homeowners’ Association.

The group wants the Planning Commission to direct the study to be revised and recirculated in its entirety.

Jim Eggemeyer, the county’s deputy director of planning and building, said the group’s concerns have been forwarded to its consultant and will be integrated into the next step of the EIR process.

County planners will present a staff report to the Planning Commission in December, who will then comment on the EIR for the Ascension Heights project, Eggemeyer said. The property is adjacent to the College of San Mateo on Polhemus Road and Parrott Drive in unincorporated county land. CSM is in the middle of a major construction project also but has managed to contain its dust well, Ozanne said.

“We formally submitted these concerns seven years ago.  Neighbors are terrified that county management has allowed this study to be so profoundly inadequate,” said Gerald McClellan, a BPHA board member. “Our only recourse now is to ask the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors require genuine community involvement and direct proper environmental studies to ensure safe and reasonable developments in our neighborhood.”

It is way early in the process, Eggemeyer said, and it will be up to the Planning Commission to determine whether the environmental documents were prepared in an appropriate manner and whether the homeowners’ group has legitimate concerns.

In its 22-page report to the county, the homeowners’ group contends the traffic study does not include several intersections and that health impacts from the estimated pollution have been largely ignored.

The Ascension Heights project will sit on about 13 acres.


Bill Silverfarb can be reached by e-mail: silverfarb@smdailyjournal.com or by phone: (650) 344-5200 ext. 106.


Email to Friend Send a Letter to the Editor  |  Email to Friend Post your comment  |  Email to Friend Email to Friend  |  Print this Page Print this Page
<< Back
 
  RSS feed RSS
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
What was your favorite Super Bowl commercial moment?

Chicken's silent scream in space
Betty White getting tackled
Dorito used as a throwing weapon
The Simpson's Mr. Burns losing his fortune
Troy Polamalu as a groundhog
 
 
  
Crews working to repair sinkhole
A large sinkhole has prompted the closure of two blocks in South San Francisco, possibly through ton..
Stocks climb on hopes for Greece debt assistance
NEW YORK — Stocks are surging on hope that the European Union will help Greece manage its growing de..
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
©2010 Daily Journal - San Mateo County's homepage